Israeli Health Ministry Accused Of Hiding Data On COVID Jab Injuries To Children
Although the Israeli State Comptroller has reviewed the data showing vaccination harms in children, no government-level actions have yet been taken. This has led to Israeli health ministry being accused of hiding data on COVID jab injuries to children.
- EXPLOSIVE: Here’s what was uncovered in Hunter Biden’s iCloud Hack
- MAJOR PEER REVIEWED STUDY: Moderna Vaccine Increases Myocarditis Risk By 44 Times In Young Adults
- MUST READ: High Level International Bankers Simulate The Collapse Of Global Financial System
- BIG STORY: Wuhan Lab Isolated Monkeypox Strain In 2020
- EXPLOSIVE: Ukraine Biolabs Used Fever Carrying Mosquitoes To Spark Dengue Pandemic In Cuba
Injuries from the COVID vaccine, including neurological side effects, are occurring in children aged 5 to 11 at a rate that is around six times higher than that of those aged 12 to 17.
Between December 2021 and May 2022, complaints of adverse reactions to Pfizer’s COVID vaccination were submitted to the nation’s vaccine database, known as the Nahlieli system. Israel’s Ministry of Health commissioned a study to examine these reports. Professor Matti Berkowitz, Director of Assaf Harofeh Hospital’s (Shamir) Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, led the research team.
In terms of sheer numbers, Berkowitz discovered that children aged 5 to 11 experienced twice as many negative side effects from the Pfizer shot as those aged 12 to 17. The fact that vaccine injuries have doubled is exceedingly alarming and ought to have been brought to the parents’ notice right away.
Unfortunately, the bad news does not end with the adverse events tripling. According to Dr. Yaffa Shir-Raz, a researcher in health and risk communication at the University of Haifa and Reichman University (IDC Herzliya), the 2-dose immunization rate for children aged 5 to 11 is less than 18 percent, whereas the rate for older children is 55 to 72 percent (three to four times higher).
If everything remained the same, the young children should have had between one third and one quarter fewer negative incidents than the older children, not twice as many. The adverse event rate for young children is therefore 600–800% of the baseline injury rate, or 6–8 times higher than that for older children.
Although there are a few more kids in the 5 to 11 age range than the 12 to 17 age range, this does not even come close to explaining the startling rate increase in the younger group.
New vaccine injuries not included in Pfizer’s leaflet
Early in June 2022, the Department of Epidemiology of the Ministry of Health received the Professor Berkowitz’s conclusions along with graphs showing the severity of the data, broken down by injury categories, and other concerning data around three weeks ago. The scientists wrote:
“[The] team identified and characterized neurological symptoms that were not previously known and are not mentioned in the physician’s leaflet of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, including Hypoesthesia (partial or complete decrease in skin sensitivity), Paraesthesia (abnormal skin sensation such as numbness, tingling, stinging or burning), tinnitus, dizziness and more.”
According to Dr. Shir-Raz, Pfizer personnel have asserted that they have “no knowledge of long-term adverse events.” However, the research team discovered that many vaccine side effects are, in fact, long-term.
90% of the women who reported changes to their menstrual cycles said the alterations lasted a long time. The Department of Epidemiology was informed by the research team that Pfizer needed to be informed about the long-term adverse effects discovered.
If Pfizer should know, why not the whole public?
Those with access to the material grew concerned that parents were not receiving the information essential to act with “informed consent” when deciding whether to inject their own children after about three weeks went by without the Health Ministry making these findings public.
Leaked documents
The data and graphs were later leaked by the concerned individuals, who ultimately gave them to the Professional Ethics Front (read below), an independent Israeli organization of doctors, lawyers, scientists, and researchers that “aim to address the ethical issues related to the COVID-19 crisis in Israeli society.”
The official State Comptroller of Israel, Matanyahu Englman, a Knesset appointment tasked with monitoring the legality and moral behavior of public sector entities, was the recipient of a letter from this watchdog group and subsequent correspondence.
“The findings have been brought to our attention, and they are serious and indicate a risk to children, and in particular to young children aged 5–11.”
Even if further evaluations of the data are still anticipated, the organization claimed that the information should be disclosed:
“Out of fear that there is a blatant violation of parents’ right to informed consent, and because it constitutes gross negligence, and puts children and infants at risk.”
Too busy to respond?
The group filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to obtain the full report and an acknowledgment of its legitimacy because the State Comptroller has not reacted in any way to their requests, despite Israeli legislation clearly stating that they are independent of the executive branch.
This lack of a swift response comes as Israel prepares to add infants and toddlers to the COVID vaccination regimen and has just authorized booster doses for young children.
This passive monitoring analysis, which is based on complaints submitted by parents, corroborates the disturbing results of an Israeli active monitoring research of adverse events in children aged 5 to 11 years old, which “also demonstrated acute safety signals.”
Matches findings of danger to babies
One may anticipate that newborns and toddlers might also suffer risks from the injections if young children are having trouble absorbing the components of the COVID immunizations. That is precisely what Dr. Shir-Raz discovered after analyzing Pfizer data on children under the age of four with her colleague Ranit Feinberg:
“[C]ontrary to the FDA’s [Food and Drug Administration] briefing document claiming that the majority of adverse events in Pfizer’s clinical trial were non-serious – at least 58 cases of life-threatening side effects in infants under 3 years old who received mRNA vaccines were reported. For some, it is unclear if they survived.”
Shir-Raz found the most common serious adverse events to be “life-threatening bleeding, anaphylactic shock, anticholinergic syndrome, encephalitis, hypoglycemia, and neuroleptic syndrome. In most of the reported cases, these are multi-system injuries.”
In one severe instance, without any mention of whether the infant was a participant in a Pfizer study and without any other justification for how a baby as young as a few weeks old had the COVID shot, Shir-Raz reports:
“‘Chest pain; cardiac arrest; skin cold clammy.’ This short description of a cardiac arrest, which occurred one hour after receiving a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, is taken from the VAERS system – the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (case number 1015467), and it does not refer to an elderly person, nor to a young adult, or even a teenager. It is hard to believe, but this report refers to a two-month-old baby.”
This baby’s prognosis is mysteriously listed as “unknown.”
Israeli Health Ministry Accused Of Hiding Data On COVID Jab Injuries To Children